House of Delegates District 36

Valley
Strong Republican

Partisan Lean of HD36 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin
22,011 63.51%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe
12,338 35.60%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding
289 0.83%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 12,558 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Augusta County
Election Day Votes: 69.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 24.6%
Mail Ballots: 5.9%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 10,040 78.01%
McAuliffe 2,773 21.55%
Blanding 50 0.39%
Estimated results for Augusta County.
Augusta County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Augusta County that falls within HD36.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,279 71.89%
McAuliffe 883 27.85%
Blanding 6 0.19%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 406 53.42%
Youngkin 349 45.92%
Blanding 4 0.53%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 454 78.28%
McAuliffe 123 21.21%
Blanding 3 0.52%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 563 76.39%
McAuliffe 167 22.66%
Blanding 6 0.81%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 643 78.22%
McAuliffe 177 21.53%
Blanding 2 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,004 86.18%
McAuliffe 157 13.48%
Blanding 3 0.26%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 614 86.36%
McAuliffe 93 13.08%
Blanding 4 0.56%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 945 86.38%
McAuliffe 144 13.16%
Blanding 5 0.46%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 782 84.82%
McAuliffe 137 14.86%
Blanding 3 0.33%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,462 85.05%
McAuliffe 248 14.43%
Blanding 7 0.41%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 945 79.41%
McAuliffe 238 20.00%
Blanding 7 0.59%
Rockbridge County
Election Day Votes: 71.6%
Early In-Person Votes: 22.4%
Mail Ballots: 6.0%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,871 68.44%
McAuliffe 1,307 31.16%
Blanding 18 0.43%
Estimated results for Rockbridge County.
Rockbridge County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD36. Explain
Rockbridge County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Rockbridge County that falls within HD36.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 481 51.17%
McAuliffe 457 48.62%
Blanding 3 0.32%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 172 68.25%
Youngkin 77 30.56%
Blanding 3 1.19%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 10 71.43%
McAuliffe 4 28.57%
Blanding 0 0.00%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 106 66.67%
McAuliffe 51 32.08%
Blanding 2 1.26%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 414 76.52%
McAuliffe 124 22.92%
Blanding 3 0.55%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 594 84.38%
McAuliffe 108 15.34%
Blanding 2 0.28%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 231 87.83%
McAuliffe 32 12.17%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 281 66.90%
McAuliffe 137 32.62%
Blanding 2 0.48%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 255 73.70%
McAuliffe 90 26.01%
Blanding 1 0.29%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 422 75.90%
McAuliffe 132 23.74%
Blanding 2 0.36%
Staunton City
Election Day Votes: 56.1%
Early In-Person Votes: 33.2%
Mail Ballots: 10.8%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 4,995 51.20%
Youngkin 4,634 47.50%
Blanding 119 1.22%
Actual results for Staunton City.
HD36 includes all of Staunton City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD36.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,962 60.65%
Youngkin 1,242 38.39%
Blanding 28 0.87%

These are actual results for HD36.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 729 69.43%
Youngkin 300 28.57%
Blanding 19 1.81%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 664 58.40%
McAuliffe 451 39.67%
Blanding 21 1.85%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 827 65.58%
McAuliffe 422 33.47%
Blanding 12 0.95%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 668 57.09%
McAuliffe 480 41.03%
Blanding 20 1.71%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 517 53.30%
McAuliffe 444 45.77%
Blanding 9 0.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 507 54.34%
Youngkin 416 44.59%
Blanding 10 1.07%
Waynesboro City
Election Day Votes: 59.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 28.3%
Mail Ballots: 11.9%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 4,466 56.99%
McAuliffe 3,263 41.64%
Blanding 102 1.30%
Actual results for Waynesboro City.
HD36 includes all of Waynesboro City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD36.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,223 55.16%
McAuliffe 980 44.20%
Blanding 15 0.68%

These are actual results for HD36.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 636 68.09%
Youngkin 280 29.98%
Blanding 18 1.93%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 475 61.29%
McAuliffe 279 36.00%
Blanding 19 2.45%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 739 60.43%
McAuliffe 471 38.51%
Blanding 11 0.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 718 62.76%
McAuliffe 393 34.35%
Blanding 30 2.62%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,031 66.77%
McAuliffe 504 32.64%
Blanding 9 0.58%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.