House of Delegates District 57

Capital
Competitive

Partisan Lean of HD57 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin
20,585 51.20%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe
19,422 48.30%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding
179 0.45%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 14,434 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Goochland County
Election Day Votes: 55.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 37.8%
Mail Ballots: 6.7%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 3,878 65.80%
McAuliffe 1,993 33.81%
Blanding 20 0.34%
Estimated results for Goochland County.
Goochland County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Goochland County that falls within HD57.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,418 63.73%
McAuliffe 802 36.04%
Blanding 5 0.22%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 256 64.48%
Youngkin 138 34.76%
Blanding 3 0.76%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 777 71.94%
McAuliffe 299 27.69%
Blanding 3 0.28%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 947 72.68%
McAuliffe 347 26.63%
Blanding 8 0.61%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 598 67.27%
McAuliffe 289 32.51%
Blanding 1 0.11%
Henrico County
Election Day Votes: 65.6%
Early In-Person Votes: 23.4%
Mail Ballots: 11.0%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 17,429 50.79%
Youngkin 16,707 48.69%
Blanding 159 0.46%
Estimated results for Henrico County.
Henrico County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD57. Explain
Henrico County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Henrico County that falls within HD57.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 4,498 55.90%
Youngkin 3,549 44.10%
Blanding 7 0.09%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,539 67.44%
Youngkin 1,193 31.69%
Blanding 28 0.74%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 968 56.61%
McAuliffe 726 42.46%
Blanding 14 0.82%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 776 52.83%
McAuliffe 678 46.15%
Blanding 13 0.88%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 618 53.60%
McAuliffe 524 45.45%
Blanding 10 0.87%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 178 56.33%
McAuliffe 136 43.04%
Blanding 2 0.63%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 577 50.48%
McAuliffe 561 49.08%
Blanding 5 0.44%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 683 50.15%
McAuliffe 672 49.34%
Blanding 5 0.37%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 974 55.78%
McAuliffe 763 43.70%
Blanding 6 0.34%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 887 54.35%
McAuliffe 737 45.16%
Blanding 7 0.43%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 776 50.29%
McAuliffe 761 49.32%
Blanding 5 0.32%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,033 57.52%
McAuliffe 759 42.26%
Blanding 4 0.22%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 487 52.37%
McAuliffe 437 46.99%
Blanding 5 0.54%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 454 52.79%
Youngkin 402 46.74%
Blanding 4 0.47%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 970 54.10%
McAuliffe 811 45.23%
Blanding 10 0.56%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 541 53.94%
Youngkin 454 45.26%
Blanding 8 0.80%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 567 50.63%
McAuliffe 541 48.30%
Blanding 10 0.89%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 882 55.06%
McAuliffe 707 44.13%
Blanding 11 0.69%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 733 55.36%
McAuliffe 584 44.11%
Blanding 5 0.38%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.